Politics in here!

1. Can the United States invaded China in the first place? U.S. invade China, but must be well organized and hidden from the public. U.S. troops can not actually launch the attack because the head of China's coastal areas are enriched pretty good. U.S. forces Asian countries have very likely not going without coercion. I'm tired, but China has kept a lot of barbarians experience of thousands of years ...

2. U.S. weapons technology and help them win in the long run to 1 billion people? Yes, in the short term. But do not let you forget that the Chinese military is not only people with bows and arrows, which have a very modern military. In addition, China will be more motivated to fight because they defend. Ultimately, the benefits of technology seems useless, because not only the strength of China has many technological applications that are designed specifically for the U.S. counterattack high technology, but also have higher culturual education, which eventually will convince them to victory.

3. The effectiveness of U.S. Air Force be? It is not very effective, as both Russia and China have just received U.S. military to throw around. Both have been working day and night to improve its air defense, and know so much, dependence on the places that the U.S. armed forces in the sky. This is going to win a war by land and sea, not Shekinaw / shock and awe tactics.

4. Is it safe to say that all Chinese citizens to fight? Probably yes, because the government can only implement a universal concept, though I believe. You already have the largest army in the world.

5. You can follow the U.S. to fight a modern army with the support of the guerrillas? No, just holding, which defended the war in Iraq-style guerrilla warfare in 1980.

6. Other thoughts? This is the kind of war that the powers that be want to have because they know it will be great. They know that the end result will be devastating and important part of a national of one world. It is also a situation that may or may not prove the effectiveness of MAD (mutual assured destruction of nuclear weapons), as if the U.S. nuclear launches, so China. In both cases the end result will not be enough, and this is the kind of war that do not want to see or read. Well, honestly, I prefer not to read or see again in any war, but while children are hungry, things .